Genetic Speciation and Evolution: The science of diversity and similarity

African peoples. Illustration showing people of diverse ethnicities and cultures from across Africa. From Meyers Konversations-Lexikon encyclopaedia, 1902.

This post is being brought forward because of the IGNORANTING on the app CLUBHOUSE I heard earlier today. The discussion was about who is and isn’t classified correctly as MOORS. Of course, this is a discussion that spans over a century in the United States at the very least. To provide adequate information it might help to know that most of the territory known as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA was colonized and controlled not by GREAT BRITIAN, but by SPAIN. Thus, much of the territory that is now the U.S.A. was previously known by CARTOGRAPHERS as NEW SPAIN. Knowing that much of the U.S. was claimed as territory belonging to Spain and that Spain was responsible for the RECONQUISTA that took place in the overthrowing of MOORS of southern Europe is very helpful. I’d like to mention that the CASTA system used in the United States isn’t a BRITISH system, even though it is the British that colonized and controlled much of India. What happened in the United States was very much the result of the goings-on of Spanish colonization and colonizers. Thus, we aren’t speaking about the legacy of Christopher Colombus. We are speaking of the pursuits and conquests of HERNAN CORTEZ. I’ve provided some videos to further explain the fact that the vast majority of NEW WORLD territory was parceled between Spain and France. The purchases that were made later changed obviously changed the culture and demographics of the areas being mentioned, in a great many instances for hundreds of years. (Roughly from 1492 to 1821) I make sure to provide an overabundance of information to help the reader fact-check as well as to look into things in whatever direction they’d like. In this post I’ve nailed down the facts from 360°.

One of the major reasons for this post is to address self-professed “Pan-Africans” that claim to know the personal and cultural heritage of -all POC and then use their preferred blanket-lable to classify all POC as “MOORS”. I’ve only ever heard 2 or 3 people try to force that lineage on people that have nothing to do with “MOORS” per se. That certain European nations didn’t have words to categorize and describe the people they encountered during their so-called “Age of Discovery” is totally overlooked by these so-called Moors.. Their choice to take Turkish names and to identify as Moors is their prerogative. Where they show their incompetence is attempting to include other people in their beliefs and rhetorical pseudo-history. The same as the word “N*gger” has its meaning in the current age, the word “Moor” was used as an ethnic and racial slur by people that saw all POC as their mortal enemies. It was a designation used at one point in history to describe all POC, and some mixed ethnicities from very specific areas of the world. It’s something like calling a Hmong person Chinese.. or Cambodian. It shows very real ignorance and general lack of understanding to call one group of people by the name of a totally different and isolated group just because of the lack of a better or even a more accurate term. In many instances these groups similar to those tribes and empires of Africa were enemies. It’s akin to saying that parrots and finches are birds.. which in-fact they are. However, a parrot is a whole different animal than a finch. They are not alike in any common or modern sense beyond both belonging to whatever clade includes the animals known as birds. I’ve yet to hear any of these “Moorish” intellectuals say that the word MOOR means HUMAN BEING. Nor would anyone rightly argue that PRIMATES, and PRIMITIVE HUMANS are somehow one and the same creature. If a Chimpanzee could speak the universal PROTO-ANGLISH language spoken all over the world at present, could it convince a “MOORISH” intellect that they also are CHIMPANZEES? https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Macaca_maura/classification/

As much as I’d like to avoid playing “planet of the apes” in this thread, I can say surely that the question I’ve just presented has been considered by other learned individuals throught history. However, has anyone really asked themselves as participants of a so-called “Moorish movement” why it is that the image of a chimpanzee wearing a fez is so very popular through history? What does that symbology infer? Let’s take these ideas a step further and ask, what is an RH factor?.. It is a scientific fact that the letters RH are in direct reference to what are known as RHESUS MONKEYS, or The rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta). Now, I could do what many of these so-called “Moorish researchers” do and spin doctor my way into playing stupefying games of syntax.. or I could just let the reader figure out this puzzling piece of science for themselves. I did say, “I’d like to avoid playing “planet of the apes” in this thread.. and I meant that. That’s a lesson for another article. I’ll close this paragraph by saying that THE ABO RH FACTORS is a biogenetic attempt at SPECIATION in the HUMAN GENOME. Let continue on..

The main focus of this writing is addressing the identity crisis not of Negroes, “Blacks”, or African-Americans. It is absolutely an identity crisis, however, it’s the brainwashing, whitewashing, and absolute identity crisis of the people claiming to be “Moors”. Firstly I’d like to state that the nation of Morocco, the historical homelands of the “Moorish” empire, and the original people called Moors have respectively existed since between 789-791 AD. It is said that Morocco was made a French protectorate in 1912 but regained independence in 1956. The next imperative question is does the kingdom predate the people or is it the reverse? It is very well known by anyone with an ART & HUMANITIES degree that culturally the historic designation of the ASIATIC CULTURE is ORIENTALISM. When addressing ORIENTALISM and OCCIDENTALISM the U.S. isn’t any part of the equation at all. Occidentalism or WESTERN CULTURE refers to Europe as the far western coast of continental EURASIA. You’ll hear mention of the FAR EAST and the eastern schools of theory, thought, and occultim as the opposite of occidentalism, ORIENTALISM. Another thing I’d like to address is the fact that the nothern hemisphere of the Earth is colder than the southern hemispere. Why is that important at all? Well, you’ll see that Australia, South East Asia, and South America is all populated by a majority POC. It is in no way as seasonaly cold in the same lattitudal and longitudal degrees in the southern hemisphere as north of the equator. The original people’s of the SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE aren’t pale skinned.. and the people’s original to the lands below the tropic of cancer are near to exclusively POC. Listening to the ranting and banter of “internet Moors” although quite entertaining will assuredly make you extra dumb if you apply their rhetoric to your everyday life and identity.

Now, if you’re MOORISH, be Moorish proudly. If you’re Jewish, be Jewish proudly. If you can actually trace your lineage and genetics to the point that you can legitimately identify as a MOOR. Be AMOR. If you can show that you have ASKENAZI, SEPHARDIC, FALASHA, etc.. roots or heritage, BE A JEW. Make it a point to be honorable and respectable. Find those people that accept you for who and what you are. If you are 100% West African, you can possibly trace your lineage to a time-period when Mali, Ghana, Sudan was running the show in Africa.. Those groups were attacked and eventually culturally decimated by Muslim Berbers.. (notice I didn’t say Arab Berbers) Once those particular West Africans were were defeated, North African admixture began to be infused into the people that were conquered. You can see similar behavior patterns in the mating and territorial fighting practices of African and Asiatic lions. Think of things this way for a moment.. There was once a variety of tiger species. While there are still more than a handful of tiger species, there are less species of tigers now as compared to 200 years ago. (for more info on tiger species, and range follow the link https://crownridgetigers.com/extinct-tigers) Tigers are not cheetahs or jaguars, but they can intermix and reproduce wih those species. Inter-fertility is a scientific fact among the big-cats as well as with bears, canids (coyotes, wolves, and dogs). As I mentioned earlier the HUMAN SPECIES has neanderthal genetic variants due to hybridization.

https://www.karmatics.com/docs/evolution-species-confusion.html

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelmarshalleurope/2018/08/28/a-long-busted-myth-its-not-true-that-animals-belonging-to-different-species-can-never-interbreed/?sh=26796f7f3e65

There are plenty of myths available to explain the nature of the colonization of the Americas. There are two American continents. North America and South America. The original people of these lands migrated to the Americas.. possibly due to the fact that the same as there were no monkeys or great apes indiginous to the American continents, there were also at one point no people here aside from those that rode the atlantic north equatoral current and those that crossed the bering strait landbridge. The bering strait landbridge migrations were carried out by Asians. Specifically MONGOLIAN NOMADIC peoples. Those that rode the Atlantic currents were AFRICANS and MEDITERRANIAN PEOPLES (which include ancient Egyptian peoples). These are facts that easily explain the demographics and genetic markers found in these areas that stem from other continents in the NEW WORLD. One group entirely ASIATIC in stock and the other purely African. Europoid genetics didn’t exist in the NEW WORLD until after 1492 and Christopher Columbus touched down in the so-called “new world”. There was no so-called “wight” men in the Americas before the so-called “Age of Discovery”.

In an article titled “MIGRATIONS OF ASIATIC RACES AND CULTURES TO NORTH AMERICA”, written by Professor Franz Boaz of Columbia University, states “No forms from which man can be descended have ever been found in America.” “It seems, therefore, reasonable to assume that man developed in the OLD WORLD and came to America later.” The earliest remains of man found in Europe differ from modern races. They are rather predecessors of modern man, although not necessarily his immediate ancestors. The American race, on the other hand, is morphologically closely allied to the Mongloid race of Asia.” Not withstanding the great differentaition of American Indian types in North American and South America, they bear throughout a decided resemblanceto the East Asiatic type and differ from all other races.” “Even the earliest remains of man found on the western hemisphere share these characteristics. We must, therefore, assume that these two groups had a common origin. The differentaition of the Mongloid race must have happened BEFORE MAN CAME TO AMERICA.

The scientific study of the origin of humankind is quite interesting to say the least. Science has many grand hypothesis as to the timeline involved, as well as religions having their own estimations as to how and why humans have been placed at the top of the animal phylogenetic trees. (I do get the pun although none was intended) According to an article presented on the BYJU’s website, the following are the stages of human evolution:

1. Dryopithecus

These are deemed to be the ancestors of both man and apes. They lived in China, Africa, Europe and India. The genus Dryopithecus refers to the oak wood apes. When Dryopithecus was alive, the tropical lowlands which it inhabited were densely forested, so the members could have predominantly been herbivores.

2. Ramapithecus
Their first remains were discovered from the Shivalik range in Punjab and later in Africa and Saudi Arabia. They lived in open grasslands. Two pieces of evidence confirm their Hominid status:
  1. Thickened tooth enamel, robust jaws and shorter canines.
  2. Usage of hands for food and defence and extrapolations of upright posture.
3. Australopithecus

The fossil of this genus was first discovered in 1924 in South Africa. They lived on the ground, used stones as weapons and walked erect. They were 4 feet tall and weighed 60-80 pounds.

Asiatic Races’, 19th century. Yukagir (from the Kolyma), Ostiak woman, Kalmuk (Mongol), Rajput, Kirghiz (Turkish stock), Tungus woman, Yakut woman, Tibetan (of Bhutia), Chinese lady, Chinaman, Singalese (Ceylon), Kashmiri (Cashmere), Persian, Malay woman, Malay of Bontoc (Philippines), Toda (Nilgiri Hills), Andaman Islander, Veddah (Ceylon), Negrito woman with child (Philippines), Japanese, Japanese woman, Native of the Loo-choo Islands, Corean, Aino (Yezo). Artist: G Mutzel.

4. Homo Erectus

The first fossil of Homo Erectus was found in Java in 1891. These were named as Pithecanthropus Erectus. These were considered as the missing link between the man and apes. Another discovery made in China was the Peking man. This specimen had large cranial capacities and is believed to have lived in communities. Homo erectus used tools comprising quartz. Tools made of bones and wood were also discovered. There is evidence of collective huntings. There is also evidence of the use of fire. The Homo Erectus is believed to dwell in caves.

5. Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis

The Homo Erectus evolved into Homo Sapiens. During evolution, two sub-species of Homo Sapiens were identified- Homo sapien Neanderthal and Homo sapiens sapiens. The cranial capacity of Neanderthal grew from 1200 to 1600 cc. Some small hand axes had also been discovered. This species of hominids could hunt big names such as mammoths.

6. Homo Sapiens Sapiens

The remains of Homo Sapiens were first discovered in Europe and were named Cro-Magnon. In these, the jaws are quite reduced, the modern man’s chin appeared, and the skull was rounded. Their cranial capacity was about 1350 cc. They gathered food through hunting. Art first appeared during this time.

Before I continue forward, I’ll state openly and clearly that there are a great many people that believe that everything I’ve presented here is theoretical hyperbole based on the studies and beliefs of those who practice scientific racism. I’ll say that it is my approach that there is very credible science involved even if it serves the purpose of the study of race and classification, all of which is biological science in and of itself. Many movies touch on these ideas subtly, one being the movie CONGO released in 1995 which grossed $152 million. The way this movie was presented should not be overlooked, as there are very interesting correlatives throughout its showing. To know what is being communicated visually, auditorily, and in totality requires an analytical mind that thinks and correlates at lightning speed and with amazing accuracy. The film touches on mutation, intellect, color, and evolution in ways that other films have not, without being grossly and overtly offensive.

Much of what is being presented in this post has been discussed and parsed by Darwinists, scientific racists, evolutionary theorists, and theosophists have gone over the various hypo-thesis that have become religious belief touched by scientific fact. There are groups that believe that the modern species homo sapiens sapiens is the result of genetic infusion of alien (outer-space aliens) genetic material. It is believed that superhumans existed in antiquity and that we are what remains of a great many types and forms of humanoids through history. Are we in the height of our being intellectually and technically as a spcies now? Or was there a time in antiquity where high tech civilizations were in control of the humanoid species and all of creation as we know it? Is the human germ but a spec in a great microcosmic culture, viewed and manipulated by a sophisticated eye in the sky..

There have been many arguments about who and what a “TROGLODYTE” is. In a quick internet search of the definition of the word troglodyte, the following is stated: late 15th century: via Latin from Greek trōglodutēs, alteration of the name of an Ethiopian people, influenced by trōglē ‘hole’.

What is another word for troglodytes?

In this page you can discover 14 synonyms, antonyms, idiomatic expressions, and related words for troglodyte, like: solitary, cave man, savage, caveman, hominid, ascetic, hermit, troglodytes, recluse, cave-dweller and solitudinarian.

Anyone familiar with the contents of the first chapters of THE AQUARIAN GOSPEL OF JESUS THE CHRIST, one might recall that both ADAM and EVE were banished from the garden of Eden and due to the circumstances often caused directly by “the Devil”, forced to reside in a cave where they both would be slaughtered and commit suicide repititiously. It’s been a while since I last reviewed that particular book, but I’m fairly sure what was being described was the human state of being less than human.. and of Adam and Eve both being literally troglodytes. I’d also like to point out that TIMOTHY DREW aka “NOBLE DREW ALI” has been accused of plagurizing that book particularly in his own writing of the document referred to as “Circle 7 Koran”. Because of the writing of the Circle 7 Koran and Drew Ali being called a DIVINE PROPHET, there is no TRADITIONAL ISLAMIC group that has or that will consider any of what was presented by DREW ALI or MSToA as anything other than BLASPHEMY and SHIRK.

I’ll not allow myself to digress and to move to the discussion of so-called “Moors” because we are currently focused on the existence of PRIMITIVE/PRIMATE mankind. Notice I didn’t say TRIBAL man, but PRIMATE MAN. The primitive or ape-like species that precedes HOMO SAPIENS SAPIENS. Some believe that the most ancient of HUMANOIDS on this Earth are the PYGMY RACES of the CONGO and AMAZONIAN SOUTH AMERICA. This leads us to the study of both NEW WORLD MONKEYS and OLD WORLD MONKEYS.

NEW WORLD MONKEYS
OLD WORLD MONKEYS

In my writing of this particular post, there are very real conflicts of interest, especially as they pertain to those with great beliefs in religion. The question has always been was mankind/humankind the result of direct creation or evolution? I believe I’ve presented that both are applicable. I’ve gone out of my way in this post not to place too much focus on the PLANET OF THE APES THEORY. I’ve also included the truth of not only the history of a people so-called “Moors”, but that all-inclusive history of mankind altogether. I’ve heard it said that the TRUE TROGLODYTE is the NEGROID/AFRICOID. I’ve seen it written that it is the AUSTRALOID. Quite recently I listened to a very ignorant “Moorish” speaker say that the troglodyte is the EUROPEAN/CAUCASOID. None of the “speakers” or writers have stated that not only is the troglodyte species a form of primitive ape, but also found to be represented in the formation and evolution of every branch of humankind from the pygmy, dwarf, and the so-called modern SAPIAN man.